The Need For Managed Volatility – Systemic Risks

This is the first in a five part series in which we will discuss why a Managed Volatility approach is prudent for investors today. To begin the series of articles let’s start with the macro topic of, Identifying Systemic Risks.

Many investors today are in disbelief about the sustainability of the current bull market. As the market climbs a wall of worry, it is important to understand where the demand is coming from that keeps the market moving higher. With that understanding investors can begin manage the macro risks of the markets more effectively. It may also explain why US equities have outperformed most other asset classes for the last few years.

It is not the purpose of this article to identify all of the systemic risks that could derail the markets, as much as it is to provide an example of a large risk that can be marginalized with a Managed Volatility approach. It is also important to mention that there are several ways to manage volatility, each with their own advantages, disadvantages, and cost structure.

In today’s article, the systemic risk worth exploring is “What Will Happen When Companies Stop Buying Back So Much Stock?”

Corporate stock buybacks have driven stock prices higher over the last several years. These buybacks cannot continue indefinitely…

Blending Absolute & Relative Return Objectives Into a Single Strategy

absolute return image

The end of the 30 year bull market in bonds has driven many advisors to incorporate alternative investments into their clients’ portfolios, to act as a “bond alternative” and to reduce portfolio volatility. This however presents many challenges for advisors and their clients.

The investment industry has been happy to respond with a flood of new mutual funds that are watered down versions of hedge funds so they can operate inside the limits of a 40 Act mutual fund structure. If an advisor is lucky, the net result for many of these products will be the desired outcome…a bond alternative.

What if the desired outcome were different? What if an outcome-oriented solution were not a bond alternative, but to blend absolute and relative return objectives into a single strategy? Could the result be different, than a bond fund in a bond bull market?

These questions were presented by IronGate Investment Management to Newfound Research over a year ago. Newfound, a pioneer in “Outcome-Oriented Solutions”, began the process by refining the questions, to solve two important investor problems:

* Problem #1: Non-core exposures can underperform core exposures significantly, in the short and medium term (2003, 2006, 2009, 2012, 2013).

* Problem #2: Diversification can disappear when needed the most. In 2008-09, emerging market equities, REITs, and commodities all lost more than 60%, exacerbating large core equity market losses during the same period.

The result was the Risk Managed Core Diversifier index, a single strategy that seeks to adapt to the current environment (bull or bear), and the risk factors that drive asset class return profiles (economic growth, inflation, & correlations).

A global multi-asset investment universe of liquid ETFs provides access to very cheap beta, without having to delve into the foggy world of derivatives, leverage, shorting, performance fees, black boxes, lock up periods, or transparency. Newfound Research was able to apply their core quantitative process to a broader set of risk assets to balance the risk/return trade-off of diversification with the need to be tactical.

To learn more, click The Risk Managed Core Diversifier Index

To learn more about “Outcome-Oriented Solutions” and blending absolute and relative return objectives visit:  www.ManagedVolatility.com

Solving the alternatives riddle

investmentnews.com

Alternative investments have never been as readily available to financial advisers as they are today. But for many, implementing the strategies in a portfolio may seem as daunting as solving a Rubik’s Cube that has been deep fried in secret sauce. In…